A YMCA Policy Allows Naked, Erect Men to Expose Themselves to Naked Women and Girls
Discover more from The Distance
A YMCA Policy Allows Naked, Erect Men to Expose Themselves to Naked Women and Girls
Grooming and forced teaming for exhibitionists
A fully intact man walks naked and erect through the women’s toilets, showers, and lockers, fully comfortable in his own skin, thrilled at the opportunity to expose himself to women without any consequences.
A female shrieks. Or gasps. Possibly, someone complains. All of these people are bigots, subject to immediate membership cancellation because they have insulted the new holy caste.
I wish that I was making up that scenario. The actual policy of the national YMCA organization not only requires this, but requires all their branches to require that naked men with erections have access to naked women.
Some areas remain, “specifically in the Bible belt and in places where they operate independently, where they ignore all this and they don’t have activists pushing this hard,” Kaeley Triller notes.
Where branches do resist this insane policy, “eventually the diversity and inclusion team will come to visit them,” Triller says.
Kaeley Triller should know. She has been blowing the whistle since 2015. She even pointed out to the YMCA VP of Communications that the new policy would allow erect men to walk naked through areas where females are also naked.
Yes, she was that specific.
According to Triller, her concern was waved away because “sometimes warm water can produce that response.” Which is true, yes. Of men.
Zero females experience erections in warm water, which is why public bathing facilities were once separated by sex.
This month, The Distance has reported on 80 year-old Julie Jaman, who was banned from her city pool because she objected to a man being in the shower area while she was naked.
At the time of the encounter, Clementine Adams, an intact man, was wearing a one-piece female swimsuit and supervising “four or five” small girls as they stripped off their swimsuits to pee.
Since then, Jaman’s story has made international headlines. The mayor and some residents of Port Townsend have reacted to the incident by praising the man and shunning Jaman.
This Monday, the city council chose to reaffirm their city pool’s “inclusive” shower and toilet policy under YMCA management.
What happens next has been foreseen and dismissed ahead of time. It will happen. No doubt Mayor David J. Faber will be enthusiastic when it happens. He even brags about being a pervert.
Sooner or later, another woman will receive the same shunning, shaming, and silencing — this time, for her thoughtcrime about an erect penis wagging in her face at the Port Townsend pool as she showers or as her daughter uses the toilet.
In fact, that has already happened at other Y locations. It happens all the time. An accidental activist, Kaeley Triller has lost count of the similar stories she has heard from around the country.
“Today I went to the gym at lunch and when I went into the locker room to change, I saw a man… Completely naked,” wrote one woman in a message Triller shared with The Distance.
Despite her best efforts to be “inclusive” in the next changing stall, the woman could not proceed and went to the toilets, “where I found all the rest of the women in the locker room.”
“We all had the same idea… To get changed in the bathroom stalls instead of the open area for privacy.”
Kaeley thought she was jaded, but that message has stuck with her “because she so clearly expressed what would happen — women would be conditioned to accept the violation of their privacy to the degree that they would stop complaining.”
Social conditioning is indeed the agenda. Women and girls are being forcibly conditioned to accept the male gaze while they are naked, and then to accept naked male presence while they are also naked.
All that any man has to do in order to access naked female bodies is claim they have an invisible, ineffable gender-being that makes their penises female.
As with any priesthood in which some men are marked as magic, and therefore exempt from normal limitations, this policy is begging for abuse, and abusive men will abuse it. They already are.
University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines felt the same way when Lia Thomas walked into the locker room. No woman had been forewarned that he would be changing and showering with them.
As with the YMCA policy, anyone feeling any “discomfort” was just expected to make their own accommodations, or better yet drop dead.
Last year, a man exposed his erect penis to women and girls in the female area at Wi Spa in Los Angeles. Darren Agee Merager was later arrested and charged with indecent exposure.
As women complained in what became a viral video, a random man was on hand to gently, pompously educate everyone that Merager is “transgender,” therefore his penis is female.
Had the incident occurred at a YMCA, it is not clear that Merager would have even been charged with a crime. More likely the women complaining would have been threatened with arrest, as Julie Jaman was, and banned from the facility.
The Human Rights Commission of Washington imposed “the female penis” as policy in 2015. It was first implemented at the YMCA of Pierce and Kitsap Counties. It then became the model policy for the national YMCA.
HRC is one of many “progressive” organizations which have been captured by gender ideology thanks to abundant funding.
The policy was implemented without any debate or disclosure. Just four months later, a male reportedly exposed himself in the women’s changing area at the Pierce and Kitsap branch. He was not arrested.
Christian homeschooling moms rebelled. Thousands canceled their memberships. Activists and lobby groups stepped in to reward the YMCA for their “inclusivity.” Mainstream media organizations were silent. Nothing changed.
Across the country, there has been plenty of internal dissent, especially from Christian groups, as one might expect. But “they couldn’t compete with the activists’ money,” Triller explains.
And with that, a flagship community organization with nationwide infrastructure was rendered unsafe for women and girls. A victory for exhibitionist men, hooray!
“The Y had religious protections that no law could have successfully infringed. They didn’t have to do this. No one was threatening them,” she says. “The Y didn’t get bullied into compliance.”
Of course not. Bullying is reserved for the bitches and witches who speak up about a penis. They deserve a good stool-ducking for their heresies against the holy tenets of “gender.”
Powerful activists imposed this change. Laurie Jenkins, a member of the state House of Representatives, was on the Kitsap County Human Rights Council at the time and has pushed to allow men in women’s restrooms ever since.
Todd Silver was the chairman of the board at the YMCA of Pierce and Kitsap Counties. His son had recently come out as gay, and it was 2015, when "trans” was being marketed as the “new gay.”
Everyone had the best of intentions when they started this. To that end, Silver fired Kaeley Triller for her efforts to raise awareness within the organization.
A victim of juvenile abuse, she is especially sensitive to the presence of men when she is showering. When she shared this concern, she was scolded to “be more open minded,” because “I was being judgmental.”
Similar rationalizations were audible in Monday night’s city council meeting. Questioning the presence of a penis is hate speech, the end. Educate yourself. Stop using your trauma to hurt transgender people.
These excuses sound suspiciously like regular abusive gaslighting DARVO excuses — deny, attack, reverse victim and offender — rendered as woke catechism.
Women and girls simply are not a concern for the YMCA. Public image and money are far more important to them.
Like many lobbying groups in this space, Silver and Jenkins followed the advice of a massive global law firm to marry their cause to the homosexual rights movement, capture institutions from the inside, and avoid all public discussion of their plans.
When it all blew up, “the crisis communications plan was just gonzo,” Kaeley Triller says.
The board of directors was violating their own bylaws. Staff were not informed ahead of time. It was chaos. “No one was trained in how to navigate or deal with pushback,” she says.
Instead, staff are encouraged to react harshly with heretics. Julie Jaman was banned from her pool by a young female staff member within minutes of refusing to shower in front of a man.
She was supposed to have understood that “pride” and “diversity” mean that men who claim to have special, quantum states of “gender” are allowed to watch her shower and watch little girls pee.
The YMCA fine print no longer allows sensible safeguarding or angry reactions to the presence of a naked man.
The endgame is clear. If women and girls cannot have privacy from males at the YMCA, then they cannot have any privacy from naked males, either.
Not even if they have an erect penis.
“We can’t let that happen,” Triller says. “We have to keep fighting back and crying foul even if they fire us from our jobs or ban us from our community pools or call us names.”