Today Is The Trans Day Of Invisibility
No one is talking about them anywhere at all for 24 hours
Transgender people are invisible today, but only for today. They become visible again at midnight.
For the rest of the year, transgender people are the most visible people on the planet. That’s because transgender people are the most marginalized and invisible community in the world, so that every day requires a reminder of their existence.
Recognition of the existence of transgender people is so important that a liturgical calendar of trans days, months, weeks, and trans-centered LGBTQ+ celebrations has been necessary to make the world see them.
Today is the only day of the year when we are not reminded that transgender people exist. They become invisible, stop centering themselves, step out of the spotlight, and let other kinds of people exist, such as women, or homosexuals.
The founder of the Trans Day of Visibility, Rachel Crandall-Crocker, became impossible to see at midnight. Hallelujah, our eyeballs turn to heaven in thanksgiving and praise for the sweet relief of not seeing him.
Yesterday, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is allegedly a Supreme Court justice, actually said that “there is no right to practice medicine which is not subordinate to the power of states” as the the lone dissent in Chiles v. Salazar, which overturned a Colorado law against so-called ‘conversion therapy’.
Colorado made it illegal for a therapist to see a patient as male or female and struggling. Instead, the legislature required every clinician to see a transgender person, thus counseling and treating the identity instead of the person. Justice Jackson approves of the state using its constitutional power to enforce this visibility.
In her dissent against the 2025 Skrmetti decision, however, Jackson opposed the right of the Tennessee legislature to ban sex changes for kids. Naturally, Jackson was upholding the visibility of ‘trans kids’, there.
She stands on either side of the United States Constitution according to whether it empowers the groomers of these children for a medicalization regimen that supposedly makes their ‘true selves’ visible to the world.
For her next trick, Jackson will stand on both sides of parental rights. She supported the ‘right’ of parents to chemically castrate and surgically alter the genitals of their children in 2025. In the Mirabelli case, however, watch as ‘Justice’ Jackson opposes the constitutional rights of parents to know about their child’s secret ‘gender identity’ at school.
She will always be on the side of the parental rights issue that makes the ‘trans kids’ visible. This is the only consistency to her views on any matter involving the political project of transgender identity as a ‘civil rights movement’.
The word ‘transgender’ overrides both Constitution and principles. To Jackson, this is what it means to be a good person. She is not unique. She is far too common.
David Mishook is a partner in a law firm that represents the Mirabelli School District. He says the Supreme Court has made it very clear how they will rule in the Mirabelli case, if it is the parental rights case they eventually hear.
Mishook also acknowledges that the SCOTUS was very clear that parents have a right to know about their child’s identity at school and direct their religious upbringing, which is to say that parents are allowed to keep their kids out of the LGBTQMOUSE cult that thrives at school.
But Mishook also expresses “concerns” and “confusion” with the result. “It does not mandate that staff disclose a child’s gender identity”, he says, emphasizing the supposed nuance that children might not want their parents to know something that they have an absolute right to know, and that this should matter most.
School staff are now prohibited from lying to parents, Mishook says, but that does not mean they must tell the parents. They can keep the secret until the parents ask.
This is the one neat trick for families. California parents must “directly ask” their child’s teachers and counselors and administrators whether secret pronouns and a change closet are part of their school day.
Otherwise, they won’t be in on the secret fun.
For now, all the secrecy practices are still in place, Mishook says. “What this case is narrowly about” is parents, whereas “we may not discriminate against a child’s gender identity”.
Only the political identity of the child is allowed to be visible to California school personnel, who will still keep the mystery in their hearts unless put to the question by parents with religious views.
Here, we find that every day at school is meant to be a Transgender Day of Visibility for everyone inside the building, but also every day is meant to be Transgender Day of Invisibility at home, where parents might have objections to their child joining a medicalized cult of self-harm.
The ‘transgender community’ stands on both sides of the visibility issue. For 364 days of the year, they are “invisible”, requiring constant society-wide efforts to make them feel seen.
Inconvenient truths are consistently buried, rendered invisible, so that they do not ‘harm the transgender community’.
‘Trans kids’ are so important that they must become the most visible members of their classroom society, then also kept hidden from their own parents, then also celebrated loudly and visibly by our social and political elites for the special courage required to be their special selves.
Visibility might as well mean focus, in this context. Transgender activism wants the murder of any transgender person to have visibility. Transgender activism wants the transgender murderer to have minimal visibility.
We are meant to focus on the positives and miss the negatives.
‘Trans men’ — women who call themselves men — are visible when they get pregnant, but seldom for any other reason. Indeed, many young women who transition are trying to escape male attention in some way, sometimes for the most saddening of reasons. Ellen Page the actress became a very visible ‘trans man’ and a nearly invisible actor.
For men, the inherent male sexuality of their interest in transgenderism is almost always something to keep invisible. Julia Serano has described his autogynephilia in excruciating detail as a self-discovery narrative, making it visible through a rosy filter, even while objecting to the very concept of autogynephilia. It is not only invisible, it does not even exist, Serano says.
Transgender bathroom access is a highly-visible issue. The paraphilic purposes of men being in female restrooms, such as fishing used tampons out of the trash to achieve sexual arousal by mimicking menstruation, are kept invisible.
Men who rape and abuse women in women’s prisons are invisible, while the women locked up with them are even more invisible.
While this travesty was enacted by soft-minded judges, the public was simultaneously subjected to Orange Is The New Black, a show about women in prison that used a transgender character to make such ‘acceptance’ seem acceptable and normal.
Naturally, the show was hailed for making a marginalized community visible.
None of this was accidental. To date, all policy achievements obtained by the transgender lobby have been won through pressure rather than popular politics. This was a conscious choice by the genderwoo lobby.
A case in point is the November 2019 ‘Dentons Document’, so called because it was put together with the advice of the global law firm of the same name, one of the world’s biggest, and therefore most visible.
Dentons specifically advised the IGLYO organization to attach ‘trans rights’ to more popular causes, starting with gay rights, and keep unpopular policy demands out of the public discussion.
Visible causes would obscure the horrific policy programs to make them invisible to the masses.
Yesterday, on the International Day of Transgender Visibility, Vincent Lundgren and Colin Wright published an exposé of the moral panic that the Human Rights Campaign has created for a decade about supposedly high rates of murder among transgender-identified men.
Literally nothing HRC says about this topic is true. “Transgender people are less likely to be murdered than the rest of the population, most transgender people are murdered by members of their own race, and intimate partner violence — not hate — is the leading identified motive for most such murders”, they write.
White supremacy is not involved in the cases HRC has cited as examples of hate. Cross-dressing was never a major concern of actual white supremacist movements; that is, transgenderism was never that visible to the KKK.
The actual rate of homicide victimization among the ‘transgender community’ is lower than average. Other than violent black men who murder their intimate partners, no one is actually killing transgender people at a noticeable rate.
Even then, “black ‘transgender women’ are about a third as likely as their non-transgender, same-sex peers to be murdered.” This very visible cause, the trans person of color being the special target of hate, is entirely fabricated.
Transgender people are one of the safest demographics ever studied.
Meanwhile, HRC has become reticent about actual, real, not-imaginary human rights causes. At times, this can seem like schizophrenia, for example when HRC supports single-sex restrooms in the Third World but opposes them in the First World.
The only consistency is that the transes get whatever they want, whenever they want it. As soon as toilet trips to Africa become popular among the world’s most visible paraphiliacs, HRC will flip on that issue, too.
It is the first day of April. Transgender people are invisible today, but only for today. They become visible again at midnight. Don’t feed them.