We Have The Cluster B Clique 'Police Report' And It is Not At All What They Claimed
Errors, omissions, and claims all strain credibility past the breaking point
A police report number circulated on X by Erica Moise, Kaitlyn Twing, and Arianna Laureano as putative ‘evidence’ of a serious crime by two detransitioners was a defective report from the outset.
The Distance has obtained a copy of Boston Police Report #I252109508. It contains multiple material omissions and inaccuracies. No charges were ever filed against the targets of the smear, Simon Amaya Price and Claire Abernathy, because the report was incomplete and flawed the day it was made.
Both Mr. Amaya Price and Ms. Abernathy are detransitioners. Abernathy was scheduled to appear before the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions tomorrow morning, but the hearing was postponed today.
We suggest the smear campaign against both of its young victims was not a coincidence, that Erica “Hendrix” Moise was sincere when she announced her intentions to disrupt detransition organizing last September.
We assess that she organized the defamation with malice through social and parasocial relationships within the detransition community.
The Distance is not a law firm. However, the actions of Erica Moise seem to fall under the rubric for determinations of misconduct by officers of the court.
We assess that Ms. Moise likely committed serious ethical violations of her profession in order to advance her grudge by organizing the smear against Mr. Amaya Price and Ms. Abernathy while acting as legal representative to the supposed victim, Twing, and a supposed witness, Boylan.
The narrative elements of the report suggest to us that Ms. Twing may have knowingly participated in the fabrication of a materially false police report. We assess that her role in this affair has been driven by the need to feel accepted by the Cluster B Clique. We already judge her credibility to be low.
Upon information and belief, we assess that Ms. Moise likely violated both Michigan and Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct (Rule 8.4).
Lack of candor to law enforcement.
Misuse of the legal system to harass or smear others.
Conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Circulating or causing to circulate a fatally flawed police report publicly as ‘proof’ of a crime when Ms. Moise knew, or should have known, that it was incomplete and inaccurate, is especially problematic for a licensed attorney.
So is romantic entanglement with a client. As we reported in our recent update on this story, Moise and Leta Boylan, a key participant in the smear campaign, are an intimate couple.
Boylan scheduled a telehealth appointment for Ms. Twing regarding a medication issue. This remote appointment became a “rape exam” according to the Cluster B Clique.
Boylan pressured detransition organizers to stop working with Simon Amaya Price, alleging in telephone communications and on X that Ms. Twing, the putative victim, had been left with a torn and bleeding vagina.
We have learned that Ms. Boylan recently lied to her own family about attending the funeral of an aunt in Tennessee to explain her absence from Wisconsin while she was with Ms. Moise. We assess her credibility to be low.
Details matter
We have identified the following deficiencies in the report. These are not minor typos. They reflect a rushed, poorly prepared document.
Kaitlyn Twing’s birth year is listed incorrectly (2004, not 2002).
Claire Abernathy’s birth name “Cassidy” is misspelled “Casidy” throughout.
Simon Amaya Price is reduced to “Simon Price,” ignoring his double surname.
In the Medical Addendum, Twing’s name is entered first-name-first instead of last-name-first as instructed on the form.
The narrative accuses both Amaya Price and Abernathy of kissing and touching the victim’s breasts, yet only one person is coded under the “Fondling – Indecent Assault” offense.
The first paragraph contains multiple grammatical errors.
An attorney is obliged to offer only truthful information and conform their clients to the court’s requirement that witnesses make only factual statements. The report form has an incorrect birth date year for Kaitlyn Twing in the narrative block. She was born in 2004, not 2002.
This error, alongside the report’s extended incomplete status and lack of charges, underscores the shoddy nature of the document that Erica Moise and the Cluster B Clique publicly presented as serious evidence.
Multiple grammatical errors in one paragraph is not a small matter. Claire Abernathy’s birth name, Cassidy, is misspelled Casidy throughout. Simon Amaya Price, who uses a double surname and corrects reporters who forget it, is Simon Price throughout. These are material errors and omissions.
If Ms. Twing provided the information herself, an incorrect date of birth suggests carelessness or exaggeration in the complaint. How did she ‘forget’ her own birthday? Or did Moise misremember her client’s date of birth? Whether accidental or on purpose, it is a glaring and important error.
As Moise is the attorney who helped open and promote the report on X, the full document reflects poorly on Moise’s professional competence and candor. We suggest the evidence supports a bar complaint for lack of diligence or potential misuse of the system, even if unintentional.
A story must make sense to be believed
There is an entry on the intake form called “Medical Addendum.” It exists on Boston Police report forms in order to separate medical facts from victim narrative. Ms. Twing’s name has been entered incorrectly, first/last name rather than last/first as instructed on the form.
According to Ms. Twing, or Ms. Moise acting on her behalf, the report alleges a “Possible Internal Injury” to her “Genitals”. Note that no medical exam or rape kit is mentioned.
“OFFENCE-1” alleges that Mr. Amaya Price alone “COMPLETED” a “SEX OFFENSE - RAPE - OTHER” against Ms. Twing.
“OFFENCE-2” alleges “Fondling - Indecent Assault”. No one is named in this section.
The “NARRATIVE” alleges that “around 6 pm, the victim and the two suspects later identified as Simon Price and Casidy Andrews were hanging out in Price room” — sic, all errors and spacing are original:
Price and Andrews started to touch each other, then they started to touch the victim, kissing and touching her breasts. The victim stated that while Price took off her clothes she froze and was unable to move from being uncomfortable with the situation. The victim stated that Price put his fingers inside of her vagina and her mouth. The victim stated that Andrews said to Price that “ She not on birth control ”, then Andrews and Price began to have sexual intercourse. After the incident ended Price stated to the victim not to tell anyone about what happen today.
Ms. Abernathy (“Andrews”) was present the whole time, according to Ms. Twing. She was so traumatized by watching Mr. Amaya Price have sex with Ms. Abernathy that she “froze and was unable to move”.
Both Amaya Price and Abernathy “started to touch the victim, kissing and touching her breasts”, according to the report. However, Ms. Abernathy is not named in the “OFFENSE CODE” for “fondling - Indecent Assault”.
In a properly prepared police report, every person accused of a specific act should be properly coded in the offense section, especially in a multi-perpetrator case. Whether by design, or by sheer slop-work, the report is flawed and incomplete.
Amaya Price and Abernathy have told the same story consistently. They both maintain that a consensual, non-penetrative three-way encounter between three people took place. Furthermore, the dates of birth on the report establish all three people involved as adults capable of consent.
Amaya Price and Abernathy both maintain that everyone kept their underwear on and had a good time. Ms. Twing, or Ms. Moise representing her, has alleged on this report that Mr. Amaya Price left Twing with a torn and bloody vagina using his finger while she remained frozen. Then she remained frozen by trauma while two people had sex in her presence.
Twing, or Moise representing her, has made an allegation consistent with the “torn and bleeding vagina” story that Ms. Boylan inflated with a telehealth appointment, circulated on X, and told detransition organizers privately, all in furtherance of the Cluster B Clique defamation campaign.
According to the report, Abernathy told Amaya Price that Twing was not on birth control. During the encounter, Abernathy says she did in fact mention that Twing was not on birth control. Again, Twing says that she was “froze[n] and unable to move” during this conversation. Before she took down her X account, Twing expressed frustration that the exchange of information took place without her consent.
We note that without this information, Mr. Amaya Price was unable to give his own informed consent to have intercourse with Twing. We assess that Ms. Abernathy was the adult in the room during this encounter. We wonder why Ms. Twing, or Ms. Moise on behalf of Twing, has twisted this normal disclosure of adult consent information into falsified evidence of a rape.
Said “rape” allegedly occurred during a digital penetration by Ms. Amaya Price’s fingers. Then Twing watched Mr. Amaya Price have sexual intercourse with Abernathy using his penis. Yet Ms. Abernathy was uninjured in the encounter.
Speaking to The Distance, Ms. Abernathy acknowledges further sexual contact with Simon Amaya Price outside the three-way encounter with Twing. Despite the health issues left by testosterone use, Abernathy assures us that Amaya Price has never injured her.
After the encounter, Ms. Twing sent Mr. Amaya Price a text message in which she thanked him for making her feel safe. In the report, however, Twing or Moise acting for Twing has alleged that Mr. Amaya Price made a threat to silence her.
As we recently disclosed, Twing also claimed to be a lesbian in order to further the false narrative against Mr. Amaya Price, but has been in a romantic relationship with a man since February. Again, we assess her credibility as low.
The report buttressing the fabrication is fatally flawed
This supposed vaginal injury was diagnosed by telehealth more than a week after the purported rape. No rape kit was ever collected or else it would be in this report. On this flimsy pretextual basis, Erica Moise filed, or advised her putative client to file, a police report that would never survive first contact with a courtroom.
Together with the one-month delay between incident and filing, the prolonged “incomplete” status, and the absence of criminal charges resulting from a rushed, poorly prepared report that was never intended or able to support a real prosecution, we assess that Erica Moise will likely face consequences from her profession.
We assess that the Cluster B Clique would likely crumble under the weight of any libel or slander litigation. The Distance has learned that Arianna Laureano is already currently being sued for defamation by an unrelated party. Continuing participants in this smear campaign may expose themselves to increasing litigation risk by doing so.
We had looked forward to the testimony of Claire Abernathy tomorrow with great hope and high expectations. We will keep an eye on the Committee schedule.
Should the hearing never happen this term, or if any Democrat on the committee attempts to impugn the character and integrity of Claire Abernathy to undermine her witness testimony with this specious and false police report, we shall return to the topic of the Cluster B Clique again.
Everyone involved will then be held to account for their part, including and especially members of the detransition community who played key roles. We will return to naming and shaming the vapid, malicious fools who did this for their own reasons.
We included them in our original coverage and received some flack for it on social media. We expected this because those subjects of our reporting are popular figures in their community. But popularity fades while facts stubbornly endure.
As the attorney who helped open and publicly promoted this report, Erica “Hendrix” Moise’s actions raise serious questions about her ethical integrity under both Michigan and Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct (Rule 8.4), including lack of candor, misuse of the legal system, and conduct involving dishonesty or prejudice to the administration of justice.
Her reported ongoing romantic relationship with Leta Boylan, a key participant in the campaign, adds another layer of ethical concern. According to our sources, Moise has acted as Boylan’s legal advisor related to her arrears in child support. An attorney providing legal advice to a romantic partner on an active enforcement matter involving a warrant raises additional questions under Michigan and Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct regarding conflicts of interest and fitness to practice.
Whatever happens in Washington, DC, we expect to do further reporting on Ms. Moise. We have reached out to her for comment on this story and we will update if she replies.