The minute I read about this school shooting by a “woman in a dress”, I knew it was a trans identifying man. Women rarely commit these kinds of gun crimes while men (whatever they choose to call themselves ) do all the time.
And wouldn’t have any, because women’s clothes often don’t have even minimal pockets, and almost never do they have pockets adequate to hold a bunch of ammo.
Because pockets spoil the lines of the clothing (which in the interest of aesthetics should lie as close to flat as possible), i.e., the way our clothes (and we) LOOK matter more than our comfort or needs. Women are secondary to effin' fabric. It's like our clothes wear us, instead of the other way around.
The minute I read about this school shooting by a “woman in a dress”, I knew it was a trans identifying man. Women rarely commit these kinds of gun crimes while men (whatever they choose to call themselves ) do all the time.
Only a man would wear a dress while mass shooting.
LOL!
A woman would want pockets for her ammunition
And wouldn’t have any, because women’s clothes often don’t have even minimal pockets, and almost never do they have pockets adequate to hold a bunch of ammo.
Yes I have been informed by many women that the lack of pockets is their chief problem in apparel
I keep saying I am going to add my own. Perhaps this will be my afternoon project!
Because pockets spoil the lines of the clothing (which in the interest of aesthetics should lie as close to flat as possible), i.e., the way our clothes (and we) LOOK matter more than our comfort or needs. Women are secondary to effin' fabric. It's like our clothes wear us, instead of the other way around.
Awesome comment! LOL!
Ditto. Me and my (male, one of whom lives in British Columbia) friends all immediately said: "yep, it's a dude-with-ladyfeelz... AGAIN."
"gunperson" 💀💀💀
It's as though we're living in a satire at this point. "Doctor Strangelove" has NOTHING on this next-level absurdity.
Great movie!!